Tag Archives: robert parker

Robert Parker steps down as Wine Advocate editor-in-chief

Robert Parker steps down as Wine Advocate editor-in-chief

PersonalWine.com

The news bombshell this morning is all about Robert Parker. Lettie Teague, in the Wall Street Journal, reported that Parker is stepping down as editor-in-chief of Wine Advocate, and the operations of his 35-year old wine newsletter will effectively shift to Singapore, closer to the three as of yet unnamed investors who Parker has dubbed “young innovators” and who have acquired a “substantial interest” in Parker’s company. Lisa Perrotti-Brown steps in as editor-in-chief of the publication that will for the first time begin accepting advertisements, and will go electronic despite the fact that the printed publication is profitable.

Since then, Decanter, Felix Salmon, The Drinks Business, Wines.com and seemingly every other wine media outlet, blogger and tweeter have weighed in on the news, and with reason. This is most definitely one of the most shocking pieces of news this year in wine as Parker has been fiercely independent, and has in the past snubbed the likes of Decanter for accepting ads.

So will Parker retire? What will happen to the legacy he has protected the past 35 years? Would love to hear your take on the news. What are your thoughts?

Revenge of the Oak Monster

Revenge of the Oak Monster

Remember when those two creepy twins in your neighborhood would skip rope and chant “One, two, the oak monster’s coming for you, three, four, better lock your cellar door…?” No? Well, listen up anyway. Cue ominous voice…

Winemakers of days gone by knew something we have forgotten. Something we should never forget. To not play with oak. To respect it. Even fear it. For there lurks a monster as old as wine itself.

So why did we forget? Maybe recent years have been kind to us, the wave upon wave of terroirists and millennials storming the blasphemed halls of the Overoaked One. Now, all but the Bordelais – and those wacky country clubbing Cali cult cab cults – have stopped kneeling at the its altar. Even the mind of Dr. Vino-stein has marveled at the possible death of the oaken beast at the hands of a poison economy. The oak monster is dead. Parkerized and buried deep within the recesses of an ancient Maryland lair.

But it’s name has been uttered again. An innocent enough article in defense of oak by one wine dude,  – yes, that wine dude – who with cojones only The Dude can muster, daring it so close to all hallow’s eve. But it would have dire consequences as the beast fed on it, the ensuing chatter in the Twitter void unknowingly opening a portal into its dark dimension of vanilla nightmares and caramel screams.

And on this all halloween night, it’s blood spilling on house party rugs across the land, its splinters impaling your palates, fruit bomb-soaked two-by-fours slithering up million dollar noses, it is unleashed.

Is that the barrique of fear I smell on you? Where can you turn? Who will help you? The Vayniac legions and their fearless leader Garyvee – who legend has it dared dance with the monster – have long since disbanded. The Rhone Rangers, neutral to your battle, watch on like elders of yore. You are your only hope. But no holy crosses or garlic here. Just a balance of acid in one hand and a fistful of vegetal notes in the other, and get ready to rumble. And like my ma always said “In for a palate fight, you gotta aerate right”, because when the oak monster comes a-knocking, it’s gonna get awful toasty in here.

Don’t say you haven’t been warned!

______________________________

Happy Halloween!

Bordeaux 2003 Vintage in the Rearview Mirror

Bordeaux 2003 Vintage in the Rearview Mirror

In 2003, many Bordeaux wine barons made a lot of noise in the media about the supposed excellence of that vintage even though the region had suffered through such a heat wave that, in Saint-Emilion for example, harvesting needed to be done very early. Some grapes were burned up, others under ripe, causing their critics to scoff at the proclamations of a great vintage. So looking back, let’s see what became of it all.

At winedoctor.com, Chris Kissack reviewed some wines from the vintage two years after the fact, and remarked that surprisingly “the red wines do not, on the whole, suffer from low acidity” and that tannins are prominent in many of the wines, but that “at this stage, offer typical mineral-blackcurrant flavors of Bordeaux.” So judging by Chris’s thoughts, it was still hard to pin down the verdict on these wines in 2005.

Then again, in 2011, Chris took another look at this unique “heatwave vintage”, as he called it. Chris pointed out his curiosity on the shelf life of these wines, which has had critics split into camps – but more on that further down – and himself found the vintage to have a multiple personality disorder in this regard. His take is thorough and I recommend you to read both his article sin their entirety.

Simon Woolf at The Morning Claret referred to the steep criticism of the vintage as “scaremongering” in his 2011 review of Phélan Ségur 2003, and 8 years on from the vintage, found the Phélan Ségur to be impressive and even a value, which is as he mentioned, more often than not difficult for Bordeaux wine. But this is only one wine, so on we go to find more clues.I wonder what some of the big fish have said…

Well, Robert Parker wasn’t handing out 100 point scores like bronze medals in Olympic boxing as he has more recently. He gave the highest school grades to Ausone (St-Emilion), and the first growths Lafite and Latour, then Margaux (and Jancis Robinson panned the lesser Margaux’s for over-oaking, so there is a clear falling into camps here), Montrose (St-Estèphe) and Pavie (St-Emilion), which surprised many European tasters who were especially surprised by Pavie’s grades. This all resulted in a war of words between Parker and Jancis Robinson (in the press) and created what Robinson humorously dubbed the “mid-Atlantic rift”. Robinson labelled the wine ‘ridiculous’ and Zinfandel-like. As Decanter’s James Lawther also bestowed praise, perhaps the heat had molded 2003 into a wine fit for that niche of the American market where big Cab, Zins and Oak Monsters dwell. Perhaps to support this theory, it should be noted that Parker marked down wines such as Canon La Gaffelière, which he said ‘lacks depth, concentration and length’, and Gazin while Steven Spurrier, who called the same wines ‘the successes of the vintage’, diplomatically responded that ‘This shows Parker appreciates the ripeness of St-Emilion more than the Brits do,’.

A portion of critics, among them Jancis Robinson (see her article 2003 Bordeaux – Drink Up!), have suggested that wines from the 2003 Bordeaux vintage are for short to mid-term drinking, while others have thought these wines could hold for up to 30 years. But I like Chris Kissack’s take on it – that this vintage has multiple personalities – though Chris’s slant when it comes to the reds from 2003 appears to be more for aging than immediate drinking (his stance was in 2011).

So in looking at all this, it could be said that the 2003 heatwave gave to the Bordelais something different in their bottles. Not worse overall, but a wine geared perhaps for a different audience, or giving something else – daresay even foreign – to the traditional audience. Difference and change always breeds resistance and criticism, and the initial pontifications of the Bordeaux wine growers added fuel to the fire at a time when in France the larger region as a whole was suffering from the same heat wave, and crops were being culled to make the best of a bad situation. And yet the elite among them insisted this would be a fantastic vintage.

Think what you may though, it is wonderful to see such passion for wine. Bordeaux 2003 engendered stronger feelings than probably any region’s vintage has in the past, and I look forward to the next vintage that entrenches the passionate critics and winos across the planet.

Tasting: Domaine Tempier

Tasting: Domaine Tempier

Our first acquaintance with Domaine Tempier, the Peyraud family, and Bandol was in the pages of Kermit Lynch’s wine travel book Adventures on the Wine Route: A Wine Buyer’s Tour of France. The Peyraud family were painted as almost legendary pioneers of Provence wine-growing in spearheading the establishment of Bandol as its own A.O.C and the large-scale replanting of Mourvèdre – which would result in wines with greater aging potential – in place of higher-yielding varietals.

So thanks to the impressive selection of wines at Marquis Wine Cellars, the opportunity to taste wines by the legendary Domaine Tempier, which Kermit Lynch – one of America’s foremost wine merchants – refers to as “our cornerstone, stands more in the defense of terroir, and is more intricately interwoven with our own history” in relation to his wine merchant business, was something of an event here at Wineshout.

Domaine Tempier, located near Le Plan du Castellet, just outside the Mediterranean seaport village of Bandol in Provence, has been run by the Peyraud family since 1834 but did not become a domaine until the 1940s. Organically farmed, the domaine is comprised of three vineyards: La Migoua, La Tourtine, and Cabassaou. These vineyards’ soils are variations of clay and limestone, providing an annual production of 11,000 cases.

Domaine Tempier 2010 Rose (50% Mourvèdre, 28% Grenache, 20% Cinsault, 2% Carignan) – From vines that are on average 20 years old, these grapes are harvested by hand, and aged in cuve for 6 to 8 months. It presented cassis, violet, strawberries, black currant leaf, with light touches of sweet lemon and ice tea. This is a very dry, medium-bodied rosé. Robert Parker has said at one time that the Domaine Tempier rose is the greatest rosé in the world, which has surely helped it achieve cult status. The 2010 wasn’t, in our opinion, able to live up to these lofty standards, but is undeniably one of the best roses we have tasted, like Provence in a glass.

After the tasting, we served the rosé with a dish of scallops with roasted tomatoes and crispy prosciutto (a Jamie Oliver recipe from one of his earlier – and in our opinion best – books, The Naked Chef). Here is a great, similar recipe for you to try for scallops.

 

Domaine Tempier 2007 Rouge Cuvee Classique (75% Mourvèdre, 14% Grenache, 9% Cinsault, 2% Carignan) – From vines that are over 40 years old, the grapes are harvested by hand, and aged in oak foudres for 18 to 20 months. This wine was very tight when opened, and decanted for 4 hours before tasting. We were greeted with black fruits such as dark cherry, blackberry, and blueberry, with hints of smoked fat. This is an intense wine with balanced tannins and high acidity. Another couple hours in and in a follow-up tasting the following day, notes of toffee, licorice and tar had developed.

Others have referred to a certain savage nature to this wine that we did not find in this vintage, but rather a character of luscious elegance seemed to dominate.

After the tasting, we served with Rack of lamb and garlic potatoes. We kept things rather rustic with this dish, and the pairing was spot on.

For review of earlier vintages of Domaine Tempier’s wines, hop on over to this tasting profile at Winedoctor.com